[haw-info] HAW and Afghanistan

[Jim O'Brien]

More and more during the current election year, talk of drawing down US
forces in Iraq has been paired with a call for bolstering US/NATO forces in
Afghanistan.  Within the HAW Steering Committee, there is strong sentiment
against such a buildup, and most members personally favor an end to the US
military presence in Afghanistan altogether.  However, we have not taken an
official position because we would like to involve more HAW members in the
discussion.

The points set forth below were proposed by one member of the Steering
Committee and were found by other members to be helpful in framing the
discussion.

The Steering Committee would like to invite feedback over the next two weeks
(September 5 - September 20) on any of the discussion points or more
generally on the question of US policy in Afghanistan.  Please send any
comments to afghanistan at historiansagainstwar.org.

Thanks,
Jim O'Brien for the HAW Steering Committee


 Discussion Points

1.  Whatever views we hold on the initial US military intervention in
Afghanistan in the wake of the September 11 attacks in the US, it is now
clear that the US/NATO presence in this country has become an occupation,
increasingly resented and opposed by large sections of the population.

2.  Despite the relief that met removal of the totalitarian Taliban
government by US and NATO forces, the new government, chosen under the
direction of the Bush administration, has distanced itself from the people,
is rent with corruption, and barely governs anything. Outside of Kabul,
warlords and criminal elements operate with impunity, the opium trade grows,
violence -- including violence by the occupation forces -- proliferates, and
the Taliban is resurgent.

3.  The purpose of US policy in Afghanistan is not to support the
self-determination of the Afghan people, but to extend the bankrupt global
war against terror deeper into Central Asia, and to strengthen US
geopolitical power in this region.

4.  The US/NATO war on Afghanistan is not a "good war" in contrast to the
"bad war" on Iraq, and the current consensus in higher political circles,
including both major party candidates for president, that the war in
Afghanistan must be escalated, is wrong and will only deepen the regional
crisis and suffering of the Afghan people.

5.  The US and NATO must immediately withdraw their military and political
assets from Afghanistan so that the Afghan people can have room to decide
their own future.  Continued US/NATO action in the country is a large part
of the problem and cannot be the solution.  [There has been subsequent
discussion of what "immediately" might mean in practical terms:  for
example, beginning immediately and completed between, say, six months, or a
year.]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://stopthewars.org/pipermail/haw-info_stopthewars.org/attachments/20080905/0b4a687f/attachment.html